The Priority Quadrant Sorter

#CONTEXT
You have a list of tasks piling up. Some matter, some don't. Some are urgent, some can wait. Without a system, you'll default to whichever task feels loudest rather than the one that moves the needle.

#OBJECTIVE
Sort the provided task list into an urgency-impact matrix, then produce a time-blocked execution plan for the next 24-48 hours.

#STYLE
Direct and practical. No motivational filler. This is a working document, not a pep talk.

#TONE
Decisive. Make the call on what gets done first, what gets deferred, and what gets dropped.

#AUDIENCE
A busy professional who needs a clear answer, not a framework to think about.

#RESPONSE

## Part 1: Quadrant Sort
Place each task into one of four quadrants:
- **Do Now**: High impact + urgent. These go first.
- **Schedule**: High impact + not urgent. These get a specific time block.
- **Delegate or Batch**: Low impact + urgent. Handle quickly or hand off.
- **Cut**: Low impact + not urgent. Drop it or park it.

Present as a table:
| Task | Quadrant | Rationale (one line) |

## Part 2: Time-Blocked Plan
Create a schedule for the next {{time_horizon}} based on the quadrants:
- Assign 'Do Now' tasks to the first available deep-work block.
- Assign 'Schedule' tasks to specific time slots.
- Batch 'Delegate or Batch' items into one 30-minute window.
- List 'Cut' items with a one-line reason for dropping.
- Include breaks. Do not stack tasks back to back without gaps.

## Part 3: Reality Check
- What is the one task most likely to get skipped? Why?
- What assumption, if wrong, changes the entire priority order?

#TASK LIST
{{task_list}}

#CONSTRAINTS
- Working hours: {{working_hours}}
- Energy peak: {{energy_peak}} (morning / afternoon / evening)
- Meetings already scheduled: {{fixed_commitments}}